Discussion:
OT: FYI, Covid-19 vaccines published rates of effectiveness
(too old to reply)
Rod Pemberton
2020-12-15 05:31:36 UTC
Permalink
Moderna mRNA-1273 94.1% to 94.5%
Pfizer BNT162b2 94.0% to 94.5%
Gamaleya Sputnik V 91.4% to 96.5%
AstraZeneca AZD1222 70.0% to 90.0%
Novavax NVX-COV2373
Johnson & J. Ad26.COV2.S
Sanofi-GSK
--
Recent Bloomberg news reports indicate that Facebook's AI is retarded.
Do we call it AR?
Kerr-Mudd,John
2020-12-15 10:25:37 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 05:31:36 GMT, Rod Pemberton
Post by Rod Pemberton
Moderna mRNA-1273 94.1% to 94.5%
Pfizer BNT162b2 94.0% to 94.5%
Gamaleya Sputnik V 91.4% to 96.5%
AstraZeneca AZD1222 70.0% to 90.0%
Novavax NVX-COV2373
Johnson & J. Ad26.COV2.S
Sanofi-GSK
Are you looking for an OT argument with Flying Skybuck? Why?

PS they're all good; probably (he says without looking at anything) they
all work the same way (targetting the "spikes").

I'd set FU to a medical NG; but I don't subscribe to any.
--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.
Rod Pemberton
2020-12-31 07:04:40 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:31:36 -0500
Post by Rod Pemberton
Moderna mRNA-1273 94.1% to 94.5%
Pfizer BNT162b2 94.0% to 94.5%
Gamaleya Sputnik V 91.4% to 96.5%
AstraZeneca AZD1222 70.0% to 90.0%
Novavax NVX-COV2373
Johnson & J. Ad26.COV2.S
Sanofi-GSK
Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV 79.34%

--
Shadow
2020-12-31 18:03:39 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:31:36 -0500, Rod Pemberton
Post by Rod Pemberton
Moderna mRNA-1273 94.1% to 94.5%
Pfizer BNT162b2 94.0% to 94.5%
Gamaleya Sputnik V 91.4% to 96.5%
AstraZeneca AZD1222 70.0% to 90.0%
Novavax NVX-COV2373
Johnson & J. Ad26.COV2.S
Sanofi-GSK
Sorry about the OT reply, but do you have a source for those
numbers?
All I could find were Big-Pharma sponsored "adticules".
TIA
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Rod Pemberton
2021-01-03 08:28:24 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 15:03:39 -0300
Post by Shadow
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:31:36 -0500, Rod Pemberton
Post by Rod Pemberton
Moderna mRNA-1273 94.1% to 94.5%
Pfizer BNT162b2 94.0% to 94.5%
Gamaleya Sputnik V 91.4% to 96.5%
AstraZeneca AZD1222 70.0% to 90.0%
Novavax NVX-COV2373
Johnson & J. Ad26.COV2.S
Sanofi-GSK
Sorry about the OT reply, but do you have a source for those
numbers?
All I could find were Big-Pharma sponsored "adticules".
TIA
Just search for the name of the vaccine and one of the percentages.
E.g., enter into Google:

mRNA-1273 94.1%
AZD1222 90.0%

etc

--
anon
2021-01-14 09:42:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Pemberton
Moderna mRNA-1273 94.1% to 94.5%
Pfizer BNT162b2 94.0% to 94.5%
Gamaleya Sputnik V 91.4% to 96.5%
AstraZeneca AZD1222 70.0% to 90.0%
Novavax NVX-COV2373
Johnson & J. Ad26.COV2.S
Sanofi-GSK
oh goodie

multiple choice of poisons

every rna vaccine ever developed caused massive death rates in test subjects

buying into the delusions of the medical priesthood can cost you your life
Kerr-Mudd,John
2021-01-14 17:27:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by anon
Post by Rod Pemberton
Moderna mRNA-1273 94.1% to 94.5%
Pfizer BNT162b2 94.0% to 94.5%
Gamaleya Sputnik V 91.4% to 96.5%
AstraZeneca AZD1222 70.0% to 90.0%
Novavax NVX-COV2373
Johnson & J. Ad26.COV2.S
Sanofi-GSK
oh goodie
multiple choice of poisons
every rna vaccine ever developed caused massive death rates in test subjects
buying into the delusions of the medical priesthood can cost you your life
Thanks, I get all my medical advice from anonymous posters in asm
newsgroups.
--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.
wolfgang kern
2021-01-15 09:48:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kerr-Mudd,John
Post by anon
Post by Rod Pemberton
Moderna mRNA-1273 94.1% to 94.5%
Pfizer BNT162b2 94.0% to 94.5%
Gamaleya Sputnik V 91.4% to 96.5%
AstraZeneca AZD1222 70.0% to 90.0%
Novavax NVX-COV2373
Johnson & J. Ad26.COV2.S
Sanofi-GSK
oh goodie
multiple choice of poisons
every rna vaccine ever developed caused massive death rates in test subjects
buying into the delusions of the medical priesthood can cost you your life
Thanks, I get all my medical advice from anonymous posters in asm
newsgroups.
Yeah me too, seems that's the only way to survive. [oÿo]
__
wolfgang
Kerr-Mudd,John
2021-01-15 19:57:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kerr-Mudd,John
Post by anon
Post by Rod Pemberton
Moderna mRNA-1273 94.1% to 94.5%
Pfizer BNT162b2 94.0% to 94.5%
Gamaleya Sputnik V 91.4% to 96.5%
AstraZeneca AZD1222 70.0% to 90.0%
Novavax NVX-COV2373
Johnson & J. Ad26.COV2.S
Sanofi-GSK
oh goodie
multiple choice of poisons
every rna vaccine ever developed caused massive death rates in test subjects
buying into the delusions of the medical priesthood can cost you your life
Thanks, I get all my medical advice from anonymous posters in asm
newsgroups.
Yeah me too, seems that's the only way to survive. [oÿo]
__
wolfgang
Do you still read clax? I posted a calendar program there, unassembled;
I'd hoped you were still up for a bit of asm; you don't have to type hex
into your system!
--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.
wolfgang kern
2021-01-16 09:47:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kerr-Mudd,John
Do you still read clax? I posted a calendar program there, unassembled;
I'd hoped you were still up for a bit of asm; you don't have to type hex
into your system!
Yes I saw your post, but my outworn eyes blurred before I could check in
detail. I remember several DIV cx...
I rare use DOS (only misbehaving DOSbox) and almost forgot how it work.

My calendar use LUTs for DOW and lap year calculation. text comes always
in ASCII-quads (in eax) which perfect fits my GUI functions.
here some of my output formats:

my standard 2*8 char wall-clock in a bordered box:
"31.12.99"
"Fr.23:59"

a longer alternative 2*15 char:
"Fri.31.Dec.2011"
"__23:59:59.999_"

my file age format stored in DIR-entry as:
3 byte date + 5 byte time (9 BCD + 1 flag char)

rare used for printable letters only 2*18 space padded:
"December 31st 1999"
"Wednesday 23:59:59"

but my output format is totally flexible so users can create their own.
__
wolfgang
Kerr-Mudd,John
2021-01-17 10:22:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by wolfgang kern
Post by Kerr-Mudd,John
Do you still read clax? I posted a calendar program there,
unassembled;
Post by wolfgang kern
Post by Kerr-Mudd,John
I'd hoped you were still up for a bit of asm; you don't have to type hex
into your system!
Yes I saw your post, but my outworn eyes blurred before I could check in
detail. I remember several DIV cx...
I rare use DOS (only misbehaving DOSbox) and almost forgot how it work.
Not much need; there's the 2 "int"s to clear a portion of the screen and
get current date.

I spent quite a long time honing [sp?] the February leap day calculation;
I'm quite proud of it.

The year display rtn @0x200 returns dl to be tested for 'lpyrness'; true
divisible by 4, i.e. if bits 0 and 1 are 0.
this test is at @01D7; register SI is a bit array of month lengths (0=30,
1=31); February excepted.
Post by wolfgang kern
My calendar use LUTs for DOW and lap year calculation. text comes always
in ASCII-quads (in eax) which perfect fits my GUI functions.
"31.12.99"
"Fr.23:59"
"Fri.31.Dec.2011"
"__23:59:59.999_"
3 byte date + 5 byte time (9 BCD + 1 flag char)
"December 31st 1999"
"Wednesday 23:59:59"
but my output format is totally flexible so users can create their own.
Nice.
--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.
wolfgang kern
2021-01-18 09:09:11 UTC
Permalink
On 17.01.2021 11:22, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
...
Post by Kerr-Mudd,John
I spent quite a long time honing [sp?] the February leap day calculation;
I'm quite proud of it.
divisible by 4, i.e. if bits 0 and 1 are 0.
1=31); February excepted.
I made it a more lazy way :)
because the sequence [6,5,6,5,6] repeats every 28 years:
if MONTH=2 and DAY=28 then
YEAR mod 28 -> LUT (28 of 32 bits in use)

edx=0 |ax=year |cx=28 |bx=day
ebp=0000_1000 00_10 000_1 0000 0_100 00_10 0000
=0x0821_0420
DIV cx ;dx=mod
BT ebp,edx ;66 0F A3 D5
ADC bx,0 ;but give CY for One
__
wolfgang
(honing is a valid term in my books)
Kerr-Mudd,John
2021-01-18 15:04:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by wolfgang kern
...
Post by Kerr-Mudd,John
I spent quite a long time honing [sp?] the February leap day
calculation; I'm quite proud of it.
true divisible by 4, i.e. if bits 0 and 1 are 0.
(0=30, 1=31); February excepted.
I made it a more lazy way :)
Only for the Julian Calendar!
Post by wolfgang kern
if MONTH=2 and DAY=28 then
YEAR mod 28 -> LUT (28 of 32 bits in use)
edx=0 |ax=year |cx=28 |bx=day
ebp=0000_1000 00_10 000_1 0000 0_100 00_10 0000
=0x0821_0420
DIV cx ;dx=mod
BT ebp,edx ;66 0F A3 D5
ADC bx,0 ;but give CY for One
__
wolfgang
(honing is a valid term in my books)
--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.
anon
2021-01-20 05:35:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kerr-Mudd,John
Post by anon
Post by Rod Pemberton
Moderna mRNA-1273 94.1% to 94.5%
Pfizer BNT162b2 94.0% to 94.5%
Gamaleya Sputnik V 91.4% to 96.5%
AstraZeneca AZD1222 70.0% to 90.0%
Novavax NVX-COV2373
Johnson & J. Ad26.COV2.S
Sanofi-GSK
oh goodie
multiple choice of poisons
every rna vaccine ever developed caused massive death rates in test subjects
buying into the delusions of the medical priesthood can cost you your life
Thanks, I get all my medical advice from anonymous posters in asm
newsgroups.
It would be wiser to get all your medical advice from strangers in the
media and big pharma who profit from your misery! They have absolutely
no profit motive or corrupt incentive of any kind whatsoever! They would
never lie to you! They would never invent a fictitious virus to get you
to give up all your constitutional rights and freedoms your ancestors
bled to secure for you! They would never do that! That's just crazy
conspiracy theory! They CARE about you, so much, like super saints! I
promise you, they are telling the truth because they LOVE you!

Or, you could go look at all the numerous studies done on RNA vaccines,
and see how the test subjects drop like flies after getting a RNA shot.
Your choice, chickenshit.

Have you heard of eugenics? Maybe the jab is your Darwin award!
Kerr-Mudd,John
2021-01-20 10:36:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by anon
Post by Kerr-Mudd,John
Post by anon
Post by Rod Pemberton
Moderna mRNA-1273 94.1% to 94.5%
Pfizer BNT162b2 94.0% to 94.5%
Gamaleya Sputnik V 91.4% to 96.5%
AstraZeneca AZD1222 70.0% to 90.0%
Novavax NVX-COV2373
Johnson & J. Ad26.COV2.S
Sanofi-GSK
oh goodie
multiple choice of poisons
every rna vaccine ever developed caused massive death rates in test subjects
buying into the delusions of the medical priesthood can cost you your life
Thanks, I get all my medical advice from anonymous posters in asm
newsgroups.
It would be wiser to get all your medical advice from strangers in the
media and big pharma who profit from your misery! They have absolutely
no profit motive or corrupt incentive of any kind whatsoever! They would
never lie to you! They would never invent a fictitious virus to get you
to give up all your constitutional rights and freedoms your ancestors
bled to secure for you! They would never do that! That's just crazy
conspiracy theory! They CARE about you, so much, like super saints! I
promise you, they are telling the truth because they LOVE you!
Or, you could go look at all the numerous studies done on RNA vaccines,
and see how the test subjects drop like flies after getting a RNA shot.
Your choice, chickenshit.
Have you heard of eugenics? Maybe the jab is your Darwin award!
Flame away loon; or give us some assembler code.

Oh I see it was Rod who did the original xpost. ah well.
FU set to alt.lang.asm
--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.
Loading...