Paul Edwards
2024-08-20 21:04:41 UTC
In another forum (an Amiga forum), someone suggested that
one of the reasons why the Amiga couldn't easily replace the
IBM PC was because it didn't have the box-drawing characters
in the default character set.
This was the first time that I had ever been made aware that the
box drawing characters were potentially of critical importance -
allowing a GUI-like environment using text.
It's unclear to me why you can't reproduce that same functionality
using the innate graphics - I'm talking about reproducing for no
additional cost than the text characters would cost in development
time or hardware performance.
I have previously mentioned that for Vietnamese I would like
something like VISCII, but I want to take 6 control characters
that don't interfere with micro-emacs keystrokes.
To support box drawing on top of VISCII-like, I would need to
take even more control characters - but these can likely be
output-only, so there is no problem if they clash with a micro-emacs
keystroke.
The MSDOS 4.0 source code appears to have box-drawing characters
in some of the files, expressed as UTF-8. This is now difficult to edit,
and it was difficult to edit even before.
I think there needs to be a system where you draw your boxes using
just asterisks, ie:
******
* *
* *
******
(or whatever)
and then it is up to some software to convert your box into the proper
box-drawing characters on a system that supports that, or else literally
leaves the original asterisks.
Any thoughts on the way forward, starting at around 1983, before the
Amiga has debuted?
Thanks. Paul.
one of the reasons why the Amiga couldn't easily replace the
IBM PC was because it didn't have the box-drawing characters
in the default character set.
This was the first time that I had ever been made aware that the
box drawing characters were potentially of critical importance -
allowing a GUI-like environment using text.
It's unclear to me why you can't reproduce that same functionality
using the innate graphics - I'm talking about reproducing for no
additional cost than the text characters would cost in development
time or hardware performance.
I have previously mentioned that for Vietnamese I would like
something like VISCII, but I want to take 6 control characters
that don't interfere with micro-emacs keystrokes.
To support box drawing on top of VISCII-like, I would need to
take even more control characters - but these can likely be
output-only, so there is no problem if they clash with a micro-emacs
keystroke.
The MSDOS 4.0 source code appears to have box-drawing characters
in some of the files, expressed as UTF-8. This is now difficult to edit,
and it was difficult to edit even before.
I think there needs to be a system where you draw your boxes using
just asterisks, ie:
******
* *
* *
******
(or whatever)
and then it is up to some software to convert your box into the proper
box-drawing characters on a system that supports that, or else literally
leaves the original asterisks.
Any thoughts on the way forward, starting at around 1983, before the
Amiga has debuted?
Thanks. Paul.