muta...@gmail.com
2022-11-25 09:47:23 UTC
If we had a 32:32 segmented system, to access more
than 4 GiB on a system with only 32-bit registers,
MZ is probably an appropriate executable format.
Ditto a 1024:1024 segmented system.
And I guess a.out will suffice for a non-segmented
system.
I'm not sure if it is desirable to have one executable
format that does both segmented and unsegmented.
ie would the simplest (similar to MZ and a.out) executable
format, that does both segmented and non-segmented,
be a good idea as a replacement for both MZ and a.out,
assuming we were having this conversation in 1950?
BFN. Paul.
than 4 GiB on a system with only 32-bit registers,
MZ is probably an appropriate executable format.
Ditto a 1024:1024 segmented system.
And I guess a.out will suffice for a non-segmented
system.
I'm not sure if it is desirable to have one executable
format that does both segmented and unsegmented.
ie would the simplest (similar to MZ and a.out) executable
format, that does both segmented and non-segmented,
be a good idea as a replacement for both MZ and a.out,
assuming we were having this conversation in 1950?
BFN. Paul.